My Photo
I am a consultant and analyst with eight years of military law enforcement experience, six years of analytical experience covering Latin America, and over seven years of analytical experience covering Mexican TCOs and border violence issues. This blog is designed to inform readers about current border violence issues and provide analysis on those issues, as well as detailed focus on specific border topics. By applying my knowledge and experience through this blog, I hope to separate the wheat from the chaff...that is, dispel rumors propagated by sensationalist media reporting, explain in layman's terms what is going on with Mexican TCOs, and most importantly, WHY violence is happening along the US-Mexico border.

Longmire_square

With over a dozen years of combined experience in military law enforcement, force protection analysis, and writing a variety of professional products for the US Air Force, state government in California, and the general public, Ms. Longmire has the expertise to create a superior product for you or your agency to further your understanding of Mexico’s drug war. Longmire Consulting is dedicated to being on the cusp of the latest developments in Mexico in order to bring you the best possible analysis of threats posed by the drug violence south of the border.

Follow DrugWarAnalyst on Twitter

« How the 2010 mid-term elections might affect border security initiatives | Main | If you get CNN International, keep an eye out for me... »

November 04, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well you know what they say ... the first casualty of war is the TRUTH. And when it comes to Mexico and the narco-war, the truth seems to vanish very quickly.

If the 20 men were really tied to a cartel, then why would their friends immediately report the kidnapping to the police? That doesn't seem smart. It seems like the disappearance would be reported back to the cartel bosses - who would see that it is avenged. Also, doesn't it make sense that if the 20 men went to Acapulco on a mission to cause trouble - that they would have a safe house and a plan to work undercover? Surely La Familia would know about surveillance happening in Acapulco. If these men were cartel operatives, they were apparently very untrained and expendable.

On the other hand - if the 20 men were tourists, then where are their bodies?? It's been quite a while now. Why would the cartels go to a lot of trouble to conceal the bodies of dead people if they were innocent?

Everything you hear from Mexico always seems to be a curve-ball.

Thanks for following up on this.

Hey ... quick update from the news today.

It looks like police have recovered the bodies of 18 of the men that went missing from the group. The bodies were found buried in Tres Palos, just south of Acapulco. A tragic loss for the families of all these young men.

The link is here:
www.elpasotimes.com/ci_16515367?source=most_viewed

Apparently the people who killed the group believed that the 20 visitors were representing La Familia. But it's unclear if this was true, and in what capacity the 20 were really acting - esp. given the fact that they had jobs as mechanics and they had no criminal backgrounds.

The killers were apparently a local cartel in Acapulco.

It seems reasonable to expect revenge from La Familia for this killing. Which means more bodies can be expected in Acapulco in the future.

Mecanics my ass, do you know how little mecanics earn in Mexico? Check to see how much money these people were paid, there is no way they could afford to "vacation" in Acapulco. Not on a mecanics pay grade in Mexico, and certainly not in the present economy in Mexico.
MM38

MM38 ... you've got a good point. The families said the guys were mechanics, and apparently the police checked their backgrounds. But that doesn't explain what they were doing in Acapulco, or how they could afford to go there.

Here's something to think about. Suppose La Familia did tell these 20 guys to go to Acapulco and cause trouble. Doesn't it make sense that they'd be armed? I would think they'd be armed to the teeth. How else could they get the job done? So if that's true, how come they just got kidnapped at gunpoint when they arrived? Why wasn't there a street shootout, instead of a kidnapping? There's still a lot that doesn't add up to this story.

I remember somewhere when this story first broke that the men at the center of the story conducted an annual trip to Acapulco. This point seems to have fallen by the wayside. I don't know if it was confirmed or maybe the family members trying to deflect any DTO association.

Yeah i do believed the they kill them

The comments to this entry are closed.